Leinster’s preparations for their Champions Cup semi-final have been thrown into uncertainty by a growing injury crisis, with the front row emerging as a major concern.
Assistant coach Robin McBryde has already warned that “alarm bells are going to ring” as key players struggle for fitness.
Tadhg Furlong picked up another injury in the recent defeat to Benetton, while Andrew Porter continues to recover from an arm issue that has sidelined him since the Six Nations.
For a team built on dominance at the set-piece, those absences carry serious weight.
Leinster’s ability to control games often starts with scrum stability, and any disruption in that area could have a knock-on effect across the entire performance.
Squad depth pushed to its limits
Leinster pride themselves on depth, but even their resources are being stretched.
Injuries have forced the coaching staff to consider less experienced options, particularly in key forward positions.
While the system remains strong, knockout rugby tends to expose even the smallest weaknesses.
There is some encouragement elsewhere. James Lowe has returned to training and could feature, offering a boost in attack.
However, the balance of the squad still feels unsettled at a critical moment in the season.
Recent form raises additional questions
These concerns come on the back of a frustrating URC defeat, where Leinster lost control of a game they had been leading.
Head coach Leo Cullen pointed to discipline and decision-making as key issues. Those problems cannot carry into a European semi-final, where margins are tight and opportunities limited.
Leinster have built a reputation for consistency, but recent performances suggest there is still work to do.
A defining test of character
Despite the setbacks, Leinster remain one of the strongest sides in Europe.
Their structure, experience and leadership group give them every chance of navigating this challenge.
However, this moment will test more than just talent, it will test resilience.
If they overcome these obstacles, it will reinforce their status as genuine contenders. If they fall short, questions around depth and adaptability will intensify.
